Subjects with Dementia in Scientific Research


Relevant Web Resources

Will open a new browser

Relevant Literature on this Topic

Cahill, M, Wichman A. "Research Involving Persons with Cognitive Impairments: Results of a Survey of Alzheimer Disease Research Centers in the United States." Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders. 14(1): 20-27; 2000.
What is the current practice of federally-funded Alzheimer disease research centers? How is the capacity to consent determined in these settings? These authors asked directors of 29 U.S. Alzheimer Disease research centers funded by the National Institute on Aging to provide policies or guidelines used in their research with cognitively impaired subjects. Additional topics covered: 1) surrogate decision maker; 2) a subject's dissent; 3) risk.
High, D. M., Whitehouse, P. J., Post, S. G., Berg, L. "Guidelines for Addressing Ethical and Legal Issues in Alzheimer Disease Research: A Position Paper." Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders (1994) 8 (Suppl. 4): 66-74.
This article summarizes a survey of Alzheimer's Disease research centers. It discusses six basic recommendations: 1) recruitment, selection, and enrollment; 2) informed consent; 3) surrogate consent; 4) communicative difficulties; 5) conflict of interest in patient care; 6) risks and potential harms. Because no consensus currently exists regarding acceptable degrees of risk for persons who are cognitively impaired, further national studies should be undertaken.
Kawas, CH, Clark, MC, Farlow, MR, et. al. "Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease: Debate on the Use of Placebo Controls." Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Disorders. 13(3): 124-129; 1999.
What is the status of current debate with regard to the ethics of placebo drug trials? How are views on the issue likely to change in the future?
Post, S G. "Why the Tolerance of Potential Harms? Research Ethics in Alzheimer Disease." Accountability in Research 7: 241-253; 1999.
What is the current view of the Alzheimer's Association on acceptable risks in research? How has the national debate on acceptable risk unfolded?

In-depth Annotated Bibliography of the above items.